1280x720 · 4s
CompletedVeo 3.1 Lite
- End-to-end time
- 34.3s
- Provider inference
- 27.2s
- Provider cost
- $0.12
- Catalog credits
- 24
Shoe continuityPass
Exactly three spheresPartial
Spheres behind pedestalPartial
No visible textPass
One prompt. Four submissions. Three completed renders.
The same product-shot brief went to four text-to-video models. We publish every outcome, including the request that never reached inference.
July 13, 2026
4Submitted
3Completed
1Did not start
0Retries
Verbatim test prompt
One continuous widescreen 16:9 product-commercial shot. A coral-orange sneaker sits on a matte black pedestal and remains the exact same shape and color throughout. The camera dollies slowly from left to right while exactly three clear glass spheres roll behind the pedestal. Warm orange rim light, realistic fabric and rubber texture, physically believable motion, premium studio photography. No people, no text, no logos, no cuts, no camera shake.
Completed outputs
Download machine-readable data ↓Four-frame review
1280x720 · 5.04s
CompletedGrok Imagine
- End-to-end time
- 56.7s
- Provider inference
- 51.4s
- Provider cost
- $0.35
- Catalog credits
- 60
Shoe continuityPass
Exactly three spheresMiss
Spheres behind pedestalPass
No visible textPass
1280x720 · 5.04s
CompletedSeedance 2.0 Mini
- End-to-end time
- 120.8s
- Provider inference
- 113.8s
- Provider cost
- $0.61
- Catalog credits
- 85
Shoe continuityPass
Exactly three spheresPartial
Spheres behind pedestalMiss
No visible textPass
Hailuo 02
The provider returned “payment required” before creating a prediction. No model inference ran, no output exists and the submission remains in the report.
90 Catalog creditsHow the checks were made
Each model received one submission with the exact prompt above, a 16:9 target, no audio and zero retries. One reviewer inspected four evenly distributed frames from every completed output. The original outputs are embedded so readers can inspect them directly.
What this test does not prove
This is one prompt, one run and one reviewer—not a universal model ranking. Frame checks can evaluate visible continuity and composition, but they do not fully score motion quality. Provider time and cost can change.